THE WAY IT WAS: Take it or leave it —Mian Ijaz Ul Hassan
A romantic can out-jump and out-sprint anyone at the Olympics, hit a bouncer
out of the stadium or thrash the hell out of a bully three times his own size to
impress a fair woman
I am a romantic — in so many words. The Left regards romanticism a deviation,
the Right considers it a sin. While Romanticism has its faults, I think the
Classicists are more inclined to tell lies than the romantics. Some would call
Romantics fools, because the Revolutionaries were nothing but romantics. But
I’d dispute that. Passion and idealism cannot be foolish even though making
revolutions against overwhelming odds is not a day’s work.
Most Left-wingers would rather have the romantics purged from their ranks while
the Right-wingers would have them castrated. So what can one do? The Left
won’t let them love, the Right won’t let them make love. Neither would let
them go the whole hog.
But while Classicism is founded on rules that crystallise into dogmas,
Romanticism will not be fettered. Marx and Engels at the conclusion of the
Communist Manifesto invite the workers of the world to unite, they “have
nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.” Lenin, unlike
Marx, wrote chaste prose but without emotional crescendos. Marx inspired, Lenin
had a job to do. I presume the first astronauts must also have been romantics,
but those who patiently map the universe through a telescope must do their job
with restraint and have an orderly mind.
Romantics by their very nature and temperament are a bit crazy. The classicists
pander to tangible form; the romantics are moved by intangible passion. The best
of modern realism or neo-realism in literature, painting and the cinema is a
product of Romanticism. Most fascists and authoritarian regimes try to adopt an
orderly classical appearance. They are for obedience, not abandon. Passion and
emotions are considered subversive for they cannot be tamed.
But while I may be a romantic at heart, I was never one in the real sense. All I
could do was to have coffee at Lintotts in Murree, sifting the crowd going up
and down the generous slope of the Mall and allow my heart to flutter at a new
face (or was it the gait) each day, while nibbling on a chicken sandwich. One of
the attributes of Romanticism is the endless reservoir of imagination. A
romantic can be anywhere, at any time, with anyone. He can be with Marilyn,
Madonna and Madhubala at the same time or for that matter the charismatic Ronnie
Schneider and the awesome Anita Eckberg.
A romantic can sail with Agamemnon to punish Paris for shamefully violating the
laws of hospitality by carrying Helen away in the absence of her husband. He can
as easily take a stand with Paris and Hector against the Greeks to defend Helen
who had a “face that launched a thousand ships” but no longer wished to live
with Menelaus, her husband the prince of Sparta. A romantic can out-jump and
out-sprint anyone at the Olympics, hit a bouncer out of the stadium or thrash
the hell out of a bully three times his own size to impress a fair woman. A
person with a wild imagination can never be lost in the wilderness. A thing
imagined should be considered half done.
I was recently in Murree. It is not the Murree of my youth. It looked terribly
unfamiliar. For private gain of pennies and vulgar taste Murree is being
destroyed. Things have changed and are changing for the worse. The tennis courts
adjacent to the Marina Hotel have been converted into a car park. The hotel
itself has disappeared behind the commercial buildings that have risen on both
sides of the road, which descends to Sunny Bank from next to the church. The
famous view of Marina Hotel painted by Ali Imam in the fifties that was
reproduced in a foreign magazine is no more.
Ali Imam has also gone but life goes on as usual — for some, however, with a
difference. The sunset point at the end of the Mall, from where people used to
set off for their evening jaunt for Pindi Point has also been blocked by
commercial high-rise structures. The cool panoramic view of the distant
mountains has been erased out of sight. More people go to the resort than ever
before but not for its trees, ferns, blue bells, wild roses, daisies, blue sky
and green prospects. I wonder if anyone tries to recognise the faces in clouds
or is bored enough to watch vagrant clouds float across the sky. Commercialism
does not mean destruction of whatever was once valued. We love burdening good
things, not caring for them, but there are limits to everything. That summer
weekend is not far when a commode will be flushed and the Murree Hills will
burst with a thunder.
The good thing is that the monkey population has multiplied. If they continue to
procreate at this pace they may inevitably outnumber us and demand their
original rights of possession. A friend accompanying us to Nathiagali quipped,
“very soon they (the monkeys) will demand their right of vote and then
outnumber us in Parliament.” Another friend responded, “I don’t mind that
if they don’t declare Martial Law or rig a Constitution”. “If they get
access to a match box they may do exactly that,” added another.
I wonder if such a situation were to arrive would we be able to live in peace?
Certainly not, especially if we don’t stop throwing stones at them, as we are
wont to do. Fortunately our attitude is changing. I found at regular intervals
on the road ‘corn on the cob’ vendors having entered into a joint venture
with the monkeys. Tourists buy the corn from them and feed the monkeys. Everyone
is happy. But I thought the monkeys looked a trifle lazy, tame and lost. This is
what happens to those who live off free meals and decline to earn their own
bread, like our saviours hooked to foreign aid — economic and aesthetic. But
enough about that.
I am presently invaded by pensive thoughts that have transported me across the
border into the India of Sonia Gandhi? A lot has been written about why she
declined to be the prime minister. I am of the romantic view that in her private
moments she never thought of becoming a beneficiary of her beloved’s
assassination. This may seem a male chauvinistic point of view, but a romantic
one. At least it is a more humane one than the insensitive and vulgar espoused
by some gross elements in the BJP. Take it or leave it — if you are not a
romantic.
Prof Ijaz-ul-Hassan is a painter, author and a political activist